TO: ERIK BAUM BY: BORJAFRAILE Created by pepe sa Sex in the Net! Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â A social and ethical es grade task, designed to show students with a Broader insight into both the lucre and computer ethics. Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Since the beginning of time, duress and women hasten fantasised over tender bodies. obscenity has always been a assort of bread and butter and yet it has n incessantly been so right away available as what it is now. sexy stories, explicit pictures, XXX- rated films and modern solar daytime magazines, ar whole type of the stimulus corporeal which is cognize as obscenity or as it is legally put, obscenity. Is it ethically right for our children to be feeling at this erotic material at much(prenominal) an early advance? Do we build a worm sense of morals if we support vulgarism? Or is it unspoilt a natural part of life that should be nurtured and boost? Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â These school principals and more be spri nging to peoples lips as we immortalize the technological age. The age of the profit. Never before has vulgarism been so quick available. Through mail-order, at secret places around the schoolyard, or unless if down at the local modernsagent or goggle box store, pornography net be purchased in some(prenominal) form or media. I know children, some as young as ten years, who have an unlimited planning of pornography. They have been candid to it from an early age and it has become an dependence like consume or drinking. Part of the line of work is that ostracizeship laws argon non enforced. virtually newsagents exit sell a twelve year old, pornography, (legal age of 18) but will not sell them a softw argon impartage of cig arttes (legal age of 16 until June 1994). The provable derivative from this claimment, is that fines and punishments for selling pornography to underage souls, atomic number 18 not high enough. So why dont we raise them? The answer to this question can be undercoat on the scree! n of both computer in the world. The network, or as one person put it, The closest affair to true anarchy that has ever existed. Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â How is one to criminalize the Internet when it is literally hopeless? What is the consumption of placing fines for copying pornography when it is unworkable to tell the age of the user. How can one even tint the user when there are twenty-five billion members and it is impossible to follow them all. How can we scratch the pornography when a new batch arrives every day and it is impossible to stop it. Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â another(prenominal) stop which makes security review rocky is the fact that censorship laws have alone recently world needful. In England for instance, censorship laws have, for hundreds of years, hard on heretic materials, where as now, they are finding that the only offence censorship is occupy to prevent, is pornography. The US excessively postulate to put strict censorship on all lubr icious material, however the first amendment of their piece of music body politics that, their shall be no law abridging the freedom of speech or press, and so they are finding it difficult to step around, the law. Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â It is explicit that people are putting an effort in to censor the pornography, however when it comes to illegalise material which goes all over the world, a balance moldiness be set in motion amongst the censorship laws of all the countries that are hooked into the net. Here a problem arises, because Denmark has no censorship of pornography, so obviously they are leaving to be slenderly annoyed if it is banned from the Internet since their laws state that it is perfectly legal. So an line of products occurs. How is the world to censor the Internet without causing discrepancies between the different countries? Indeed, some people say, wherefore bother? Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â So far, you have seen that there would be a great difficultn ess involved in censoring the Internet. So the other! cheek of the blood, presented by the economists and pornography fanatics, is that, why should we censor the Internet when perhaps it is not needed. There are umteen people in the world who will tell you that pornography is a sinless part of life. Artists will tell you that the bare-assed body is a picture of beauty, grace and style. Authorities in Denmark will say that pornography is a valued part of their society and psychologists will tell you that pornography reduces the rate of internal abuse and rape. Indeed, the human being body is a natural part of life in all of its forms, so why do we regard the naked body as been obscene. Is it not stated in the sacred scripture that recognition told us to where clothes? And did it not too state that matinee idol did not indirect request us to have wisdom? So can it not also be said, that God did not want us to put one over clothes and so therefore, he was encouraging pornography?
This telephone line seems to demolish the religious fanatics who say that we will burn in hell for feeling at obscene materials. Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â After smell at both sides of the argument, it is obvious to see that some centerfield point must be reached between the two. Pornography on the Internet cannot be totally band and yet it cannot be accessed by any(prenominal) user as our societys ethics are against children looking at pornography. A set of ethics or laws must be devised that will satisfy each and every soil which is on the Internet. It must be devised by a brass party such as the United Nations, or by a committee which has re presentatives from each country. Â Â Â Â Â Â Â! Â My evaluation of the argument and my recommendations are as follows, Pornography which is stored on the Internet must be placed in an area which can be accessed only by a password, as well as appointment which proves that the user is over eighteen. (eg A drivers license number.) Pornography which is found on public bulletin boards must be deleted immediately. This is the right of not only the governing committee, but also the user. Files which are identified as pornography are to be traced and any under eighteen users are to be fined accordingly. viewing consultation of pornography who are over eighteen are to suspire strictly confidential. No personal data is to be released unless it is compulsory for National Security ecetera. Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â The above recommendations, if carried out on the Internet, would ply the world with a pornography-safe network, one that could be used by children and adults alike across the globe. Bibliography 1) Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â The Electronic Encyclopedia, Grolier Electronic Publishing, Inc, 1990 2) Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Times Magazine, pack Button, December 13th, 1993 3) Times Magazine, Philip Elmer-Dewitt, July 25th, 1994 4) Pornography and Silence, Susan Griffin, 1981 5) Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Literature, Obcenity and the Law, Felix Lewis, 1976 6) The End of Obscenity, Charles Rembar, 1968 7) Pornography, Obscenity and the Law, Lester Sobel, 1978 If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website:
OrderCustomPaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, visit our page:
write my paper
